[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue Mar 9 20:58:10 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wnzrf ng fhzaref.ngu.pk (Xnzrf Ehzaref) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1078876022.18843.4.camel@devel -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1078878884.18843.8.camel@devel -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1078880817.5422.0.camel@devel --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Simple QoS -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue Mar 9 20:58:10 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: james at sumners.ath.cx (James Sumners)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <1078880817.5422.0.camel@devel></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <1078876022.18843.4.camel@devel> <<a href="msg00268.html">[email protected]</a>> <1078878884.18843.8.camel@devel> <<a href="msg00269.html">[email protected]</a>> <1078880817.5422.0.camel@devel></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Simple QoS</li>
On 09 Mar 2004 20:06:57 -0500
Chris Fowler <cfowler at outpostsentinel.com> wrote:
> I ran it after and I see an immediate difference.
>
> Works great!
>
> On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 19:50, james at sumners.ath.cx wrote:
> > I have no idea. I haven't had a chance to mess with it myself; I just
> > know that it is designed for home broadband connections that are easily
> > affected by uploading. I really need to start working on it though,
> > playing games and getting lag in the middle because your room mates
> > start uploading stuff is annoying.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:34:44PM -0500, Chris Fowler wrote:
> > > should I run the shaping rules before or after my iptables rules for
> > > firewall and masq?
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 18:58, james at sumners.ath.cx wrote:
> > > > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://lartc.org/wondershaper/">http://lartc.org/wondershaper/</a>
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:47:02PM -0500, Chris Fowler wrote:
> > > > > I'm trying to setup a simple QoS rule that will limit my SMTP traffic
> > > > > to 10% of total bandwidth.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is the problem. I have a 256k uplink. When I send mail with
> > > > > attachments it can use all of the bandwidth. What I would like to do
> > > > > is limit SMTP traffic out to max out at 10% of the total uplink speed.
> > > > > I
> > > > > do not want to reserve any bandwidth. I just want to limit the amount
> > > > > that can be consumed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone have a quick and easy way to do this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Chris
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Ale mailing list
> > > > > Ale at ale.org
> > > > > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ale mailing list
> > > Ale at ale.org
> > > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
--
I used to be interested in Windows NT, but the more I see of it the more it
looks like traditional Windows with a stabler kernel. I don't find anything
technically interesting there. In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money
than it is at making good operating systems. -- Linus Torvalds
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00267" href="msg00267.html">[ale] Simple QoS</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00268" href="msg00268.html">[ale] Simple QoS</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> james at sumners.ath.cx (james at sumners.ath.cx)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00278" href="msg00278.html">[ale] Simple QoS</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00269" href="msg00269.html">[ale] Simple QoS</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> james at sumners.ath.cx (james at sumners.ath.cx)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00279" href="msg00279.html">[ale] Simple QoS</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00271.html">[ale] Simple QoS</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00280.html">[ale] X10 controls?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00271.html">[ale] Simple QoS</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00270.html">[ale] still ALE Mail last received 8:30am March 8</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00272"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00272"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>