[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon Mar 15 17:33:39 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wxancxn ng xarheb.arg (Xbr Yancxn) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1079313494.1754.34.camel@localhost -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1079364462.1754.52.camel@localhost -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] "What's So Bad About Microsoft?" -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon Mar 15 17:33:39 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00511.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <1079313494.1754.34.camel@localhost> <<a href="msg00481.html">[email protected]</a>> <1079364462.1754.52.camel@localhost> <<a href="msg00511.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] "What's So Bad About Microsoft?"</li>
> You just don't get much anymore from closed source without paying thru
> the nose compared to the offerings of open source. We know that MS is
> security wise much less secure and with constant large dangerous holes
> being found. That will not end for a long time. The source is
> available under Linux while costs thru the nose for closed source.
> The motives of closed source companies tend to be selfish while open
> source projects are selfless or "less selfish" in nature.
Or equally selfish in a completely different (that is, non-monetary)
domain. I assume everyone here has read "Cathedral+Bazaar" etc.
> Software
> installation is much more advanced in the open source world over
> closed source.
IMO, quality software installation in the OSS world is all over the
map. The best-of-breed OSS installation tech seems to be generally
superior to the closed source world, but I find I frequently have to
deal with software that isn't so nicely packaged. And even though,
say, APT is technically superior to InstallShield, it doesn't look as
cool because it's character-based.
[snip]
-- Joe
--
Resist the feed.
--
If you really want to get my attention, send mail to
jknapka .at. kneuro .dot. net.
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00472" href="msg00472.html">[ale] "What's So Bad About Microsoft?"</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00481" href="msg00481.html">[ale] "What's So Bad About Microsoft?"</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00492" href="msg00492.html">[ale] "What's So Bad About Microsoft?"</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00511" href="msg00511.html">[ale] "What's So Bad About Microsoft?"</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dhurst at kennesaw.edu (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00534.html">[ale] Quick LInux Quiz</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00536.html">[ale] Quick LInux Quiz</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00511.html">[ale] "What's So Bad About Microsoft?"</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00538.html">[ale] "What's So Bad About Microsoft?"</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00535"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00535"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>