[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Fri Mar 19 17:19:06 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: gserrzna ng vagry.qvtvpurz.arg (gserrzna ng vagry.qvtvpurz.arg) -->
- <!--x-message-id: Pine.LNX.4.44.0403191703050.31589-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Low-end tapedrives for SOHO environment -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Fri Mar 19 17:19:06 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: tfreeman at intel.digichem.net (tfreeman at intel.digichem.net)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Low-end tapedrives for SOHO environment</li>
> <griffisb at bellsouth.net> writes:
>
> > I didn't want to hijack the Bacula thread, but did want to discuss various options for tape backups for the small office/home office environment. Particularly for a charity (church) on a budget.
> >
> > I saw the discussions on good tape drive units, but know a church (or home user) would have problems justifying 1K or so. How do the IDE tape drives stack up as far as reliability? I saw that you can pick up a Seagate 10/20Gig IDE Tape Drive unit for $184 or so online. That is closer to my budget. Even saw them for less. Looks like tapes are in the $34 range.
>
> It's probably a Travan drive. Those things are like inkjet printers:
> cheap up front, but the ongoing maintenance will bankrupt you.
>
> Look for a SCSI DAT drive on eBay. You can get similar prices for
> similar drive capacities (if you buy used), but DAT tapes are closer
> to $7 each.
>
> Anyway, as another poster pointed out, an extra HD or two is probably
> the cheapest solution. Cheap tapes will never keep up with HD
> capacity, so you'll never be able to do a complete system backup on
> tape, barring some fundamental technology innovation.
My appologies if ignorance butts in here, but this feels a little like
another of those horrid "it depends" situations. Granted, tape for most
back-up applications is probably dead. Tape itself is relatively cheap,
but the drives and packaging kill the technology. If the prime purpose of
the backup is quick recovery from horrid disaster, a trio or so of HD's of
sufficient size, caddies, and the drawer thingy in a computer case is
likely to be the most cost effective. Longer term archival style backup
("here are my financials, business letters, and product for 2003, first
quarter") CD/DVD would seem to make more sense. I'm not sure how legal
records would affect the balance. (Could be an interesting situation too)
--
=============================================
If you think Education is expensive
Try Ignorance
Author Unknown
============================================
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00744" href="msg00744.html">[ale] Low-end tapedrives for SOHO environment</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> freemyer-ml at NorcrossGroup.com (Greg Freemyer)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00726" href="msg00726.html">[ale] Low-end tapedrives for SOHO environment</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00741.html">[ale] Low-end tapedrives for SOHO environment</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00743.html">[ale] run app from *dm?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00726.html">[ale] Low-end tapedrives for SOHO environment</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00744.html">[ale] Low-end tapedrives for SOHO environment</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00742"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00742"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>