[no subject]

When you configure LTSP to run applications locally on a given 
workstation, is the system smart enough to borrow memory from the server 
for larger applications that the thin client doesn't have enough memory 
to run, or is it stuck with the local RAM to try and get everything done 
forevermore?

Anyone with direct experience enabling LTSP thin clients to run 
applications locally including performance observations, any measurements 
taken, and overall operational improvements, I'd be most interested in 
hearing about them.

-- 
Brian Chase
Email:  networkr0 at cfl.rr.com

<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://openalternatives.net";>http://openalternatives.net</a>


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00819.html">[ale] New Media Linux on Boot CD distro</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00821.html">[ale] New Media Linux on Boot CD distro</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00818.html">[ale] Bind 9.2.3 and Windows 2000 Secondary DNS</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00823.html">[ale] Script at Login Question</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00820"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00820"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>