[no subject]

I think it's just this attitude that prevents a lot of companies from finally making the jump to the Linux desktop.  I mean, how dare they sell a product, and (gasp!) make money doing so!  You're absolutely right...the very fact that the software is open source and freely available elsewhere removes any right they have to charge any more than what you could buy a six pack of Old Milwaukee for at Citgo.  

They're not forcing you to buy it from them...only offering...


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00890" href="msg00890.html">[ale] WinGIMP.com selling 'packaged versions' of GIMP 2.0 for	Windows</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jasonday at worldnet.att.net (Jason Day)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00873" href="msg00873.html">[ale] WinGIMP.com selling 'packaged versions' of GIMP 2.0 for	Windows</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Sigmascape1 at cs.com (Sigmascape1 at cs.com)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00887.html">[ale] which distro warns you not to run as root with a message	window</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00889.html">[ale] WinGIMP.com selling 'packaged versions' of GIMP 2.0 for	Windows</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00882.html">[ale] WinGIMP.com selling 'packaged versions' of GIMP 2.0 for	Windows</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00890.html">[ale] WinGIMP.com selling 'packaged versions' of GIMP 2.0 for	Windows</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00888"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00888"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>