[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue Mar 30 11:12:35 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: quhefg ng xraarfnj.rqh (Rbj Vhefg) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] New Hardware -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue Mar 30 11:12:35 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: dhurst at kennesaw.edu (Dow Hurst)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg01087.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg01058.html">[email protected]</a>> <[email protected]> <<a href="msg01086.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg01087.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] New Hardware</li>
Jeff Layton wrote:
> Dow,
>
> For your applications at work, I would definitely stick with
> Opteron. The I2 is really a floating-point only box and
> not that great at it (the Opteron is pretty dam close to it).
> Beside the I2 is something like 3 times the cost of the Opteron.
> If I remember correctly, the I2 boxes also suffer from
> memory bandwidth issues like the Xeon for SMP boxes.
> That is, they share the memory bandwidth. Of course, the
> Opteron CPUs on an SMP box get full access to the memory
> bandwidth.
> Besides, even HP is now selling Opterons. I've also seen
> rumors that Dell is selling Opterons! Perhaps my ice skates
> for Hell will come in handy.
>
> Jeff
>
>> Jonathon,
>> Would you be more specific? Are these Itanium2 chips versus Opterons
>> of what speeds? What code are you running? Are they single, dual or
>> clustered? Thanks since we are in the running to purchase something
>> along these lines,
>> Dow
>>
>>
>> Jonathan Glass (IBB) wrote:
>>
>>> I'm liking the performance I see out of my Opteron boxes. They're
>>> holding their own with my Itanium boxes, but they're much more
>>> affordable. :) Of course, your budget may vary!
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 10:45, Robert L. Harris wrote:
>>>
>>>> Next month (late april probably) I'm looking to get a new
>>>> Desktop/Workstation for home. I've been pointed at a P4 with HT, SATA
>>>> drives by a co-worker. Anyone else have any suggestions? Right now
>>>> I'm
>>>> looking at a Dell due to cost but I wouldn't mind paying a bit more to
>>>> support someone local. Of course it'll be a Linux/Win dual-boot.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> :wq!
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
>>>> @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
>>>> DISCLAIMER:
>>>> These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
>>>>
>>>> With Dreams To Be A King First One Should Be A Man
>>>> - Manowar
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ale mailing list
>>>> Ale at ale.org
>>>> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ale mailing list
>>> Ale at ale.org
>>> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________________
Dow Hurst Office: 770-499-3428 *
Systems Support Specialist Fax: 770-423-6744 *
1000 Chastain Rd. Bldg. 12 *
Chemistry Department SC428 Email: dhurst at kennesaw.edu *
Kennesaw State University Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com *
Kennesaw, GA 30144 *
************************************************************
This message (including any attachments) contains *
confidential information intended for a specific individual*
and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the *
intended recipient, you should delete this message and are *
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution *
of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, *
is strictly prohibited. *
************************************************************
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="01058" href="msg01058.html">[ale] New Hardware</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net (Robert L. Harris)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="01059" href="msg01059.html">[ale] New Hardware</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jonathan.glass at ibb.gatech.edu (Jonathan Glass IBB)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="01086" href="msg01086.html">[ale] New Hardware</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dhurst at kennesaw.edu (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="01087" href="msg01087.html">[ale] New Hardware</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jeffrey.b.layton at lmco.com (Jeff Layton)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01093.html">[ale] New Hardware</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01095.html">[ale] STORY LINK: Vendor slammed for 'selling' patches</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01087.html">[ale] New Hardware</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01090.html">[ale] New Hardware</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#01094"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#01094"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>