[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Distro Reply

Subject: [ale] Distro Reply
From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
Date: Mon Jan 3 12:45:21 2005
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

John P. Healey wrote:
> Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org> writes:
> 
>>Yeah...  I don't get that either.  The most mature products on the planet
>>are not an option... 
> 
> 
> He's probably looking to broaden his horizons and explore packaging systems
> that aren't rpm based.  Also, I fail to see how Debian is any less mature than
> redhat, mandrake, and fedora.

Stable Debian running a 2.2 kernel.  To me, that is not mature, that is 
old.  Personal opinion.

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Distro Reply
  - From: jpheale at LearnLink.Emory.Edu (John P. Healey)
- [ale] Distro Reply
  - From: jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)
- [ale] Distro Reply
  - From: audilover at speedfactory.net (Raylynn Knight)
- [ale] Distro Reply
  - From: preston.boyington at mindspring.com (Preston Boyington)

References:
- [ale] Distro Reply
  - From: jpheale at LearnLink.Emory.Edu (John P. Healey)

Prev by Date: [ale] Distro Reply
Next by Date: [ale] Distro Reply
Previous by thread: [ale] Distro Reply
Next by thread: [ale] Distro Reply
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread