[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Bellsouth DSL
- Subject: [ale] Bellsouth DSL
- From: jsheets at yahoo.com (Jerald Sheets)
- Date: Mon Jan 10 10:29:10 2005
- In-reply-to: <1105358505.6981.9.camel@blue>
--- Jim Popovitch <jimpop at yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 06:51 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
> > Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Well, here's why: Spammers use dialup, and other
> cheap lines, to bulk
> email their trash directly to other mailservers.
> So, if I run a
> legitimate mailserver. I have to make a choice
> whether to accept email
> from all of Comcast's IPs or just the ones
> identified as Comcast's mail
> servers. If Comcast blocked port 25 then Comcast
> becomes responsible
> for approving their users behavior, etc., rather
> then EVERY other
> business.
And after reading this again....
Why don't you (instead of slamming someone's choice of
ISP's) get behind a sound solution like Sender Policy
framework + secure sendmail/postfix/qmail
implementation? Everywhere I've implemented this, the
company's problems with Spammers using their email
address space for spamming has just quietly withered
away.
Choose a technical route and support standards.
(and yes, I use SPF on my DNS servers on my
Speedfactory service)