[ale] comcast static IP?

[esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)]

Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 19:01 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
> 
>>>It may cloud things, but he is right, it is valid because you agree to
>>>those terms in a contract.  Those terms fit fine with the statutes in
>>>place at all levels.  It would hold up in a court of law very easliy.
>>
>>It appears to me that Mr. P. has a poor set of ethics...  (It's okay if 
>>I can get away with it..)
> 
> 
> OK, show me the violation?  Surely if there is a definitive someone can
> produce it.

I never said there was a violation.  You stated that if it wasn't 
enforceable you weren't worried about it.

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey