[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Sendmail latency
- Subject: [ale] Sendmail latency
- From: FishR at bellsouth.net (Ryan Fish)
- Date: Tue Jan 25 12:07:20 2005
- References: <[email protected]><053d01c50297$4c75c130$59b4fea9@win2kpro1><054601c5029b$08e2e0c0$59b4fea9@win2kpro1><1106631883.12632.9.camel@blue><[email protected]><05c401c502e7$c3243c80$59b4fea9@win2kpro1><1106663161.14585.2.camel@blue><05e201c502ed$93b3dc70$59b4fea9@win2kpro1><1106667327.14585.50.camel@blue><061e01c502f8$1c3b4b00$59b4fea9@win2kpro1> <1106670862.14585.63.camel@blue>
> On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 11:08 -0500, Ryan Fish wrote:
> > > I would also verify that the "forwards" section of named.conf has the
> > > correct upstream nameservers identified.
> >
> > I find nothing regarding "forwards" in named.conf
>
> Without a forwards section your DNS requests will all go the the root
> DNS servers (not a real good idea). Does your hosting/IP provider
> provide DNS servers for you to use? These would/should be much faster
> then querying the roots.
>
> Here is an example of a forwarders statement:
>
> forwarders { 192.168.10.10; 192.168.100.10; };
- Where would I add this to named.conf?
>
> I would also recommend that you change /etc/resolv.conf to this:
>
> search <your_domain>
> nameserver 127.0.0.1
> nameserver 192.168.10.10 <- replace this with your providers DNS
> nameserver 192.168.100.10 <- replace this with your providers DNS
- If I place the ISP's NS before the local NS (192.168.3.X) I receive
transient parse errors when attempting to send msgs from the mail server.
It is also VERY slow when I do that (I tried that on 14JAN05).
>
> >
> > - The sendmail processes must be working "right" then.
>
> Sendmail *never* works right, most folks are just lucky. ;-)
Hence, the quotes around the word right... :)
It appears this entire ordeal could be caused by a message being "stuck" in
one of the five queues used by the JavaMail API in their Java app. They
restarted their app just a bit ago and three of the five queues cleared out
in seconds while the other two just sat there for some reason. To be quite
honest, I hope this is the case!!!
Thank you for all of your help (this is to everyone who responded btw). If
I am still experiencing difficulty with this later today I will be back...
:)