[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Why LISP? (was Why Ruby?)

Subject: [ale] Why LISP? (was Why Ruby?)
From: jbaldwin at antinode.net (James Baldwin)
Date: Thu Jan 27 11:57:25 2005
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

When I began developing LISP, I found Common LISP by Steele to be very  
helpful.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1555580416/ 
qid=1106844601/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl14/002-3063911-6355237? 
v=glance&s=books&n=507846


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part

References:
- [ale] Why LISP? (was Why Ruby?)
  - From: sriad at uab.edu (Aditya Srinivasan)
- [ale] Why LISP? (was Why Ruby?)
  - From: jpheale at LearnLink.Emory.Edu (John P. Healey)

Prev by Date: [ale] Why Ruby? [was Pyhon syntax]
Next by Date: [ale] OT Speedfactory Problems Anyone?
Previous by thread: [ale] Why LISP? (was Why Ruby?)
Next by thread: [ale] Why LISP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread