[no subject]

They're getting better, it's just not considered viable on a widespread
basis yet.

Jerald M. Sheets jr.
Sr. UNIX Systems Administrator
McKesson, Inc.
(404) 293-8762
**********
>su -
Password:
# cat /dev/flood > /dev/earth
# rdev noah+beasts
# dd if=noah+beasts of=/dev/earth

PGP Key: 0x6267F183

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d+ s++: a C++++ UL++++ P++ L+++ E--- W++ N+ o-- K+ w-- 
O M+ V PS- PE++ Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R* tv- b+ DI++++ D++ 
G+ e h---- r+++ y++++ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK----- 

-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [<a  rel="nofollow" href="mailto:ale-bounces";>mailto:ale-bounces</a> at ale.org] On Behalf Of Raylynn
Knight
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 5:12 PM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] Distro Reply

On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 12:41 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
&gt; John P. Healey wrote:
&gt; &gt; Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts &lt;ale at ale.org&gt; writes:
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt;&gt;Yeah...  I don't get that either.  The most mature products on the 
&gt; &gt;&gt;planet are not an option...
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; He's probably looking to broaden his horizons and explore packaging 
&gt; &gt; systems that aren't rpm based.  Also, I fail to see how Debian is 
&gt; &gt; any less mature than redhat, mandrake, and fedora.
&gt; 
&gt; Stable Debian running a 2.2 kernel.  To me, that is not mature, that 
&gt; is old.  Personal opinion.
&gt; 
Stable Debian is 3.0r4 released on 1 January 2005.  Debian supports many
hardware architectures, some of which only have a 2.2 kernel.  Debian 3.0
was originally released 19 July 2002 so the default install kernel is a 2.2
based kernel, however a 2.4 kernel is optional and available on
x86 hardware at boot time.

 
--
Raylynn Knight &lt;audilover at speedfactory.net&gt;

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 12/30/2004
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 12/30/2004
 


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00058" href="msg00058.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> audilover at speedfactory.net (Raylynn Knight)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00058.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00060.html">[ale] NW ALE meeting</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00058.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00064.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00059"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00059"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>