[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sun Jan 23 11:28:22 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wvzcbc ng lnubb.pbz (Xvz Bbcbivgpu) -->
- <!--x-message-id: 1106497311.23449.31.camel@blue -->
- <!--x-reference: 20050120135732.3f2b3b01@dev -->
- <!--x-reference: 1106434284.9921.14.camel@blue -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1106495542.23449.18.camel@blue -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] comcast static IP? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sun Jan 23 11:28:22 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00899.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <20050120135732.3f2b3b01@dev> <1106434284.9921.14.camel@blue> <<a href="msg00878.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00896.html">[email protected]</a>> <1106495542.23449.18.camel@blue> <<a href="msg00899.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] comcast static IP?</li>
Not necessarily. Although this concept makes sense, it is not
universal. I can't speak to the escalation practices at BellSouth, but
in the software industry where i work that is not the case.
Specifically, reseller technicians go through the same call support
process as end-users. Again, not universal, but more often than not.
I've dealt with BellSouth business services in the past as a customer of
Savvis (pre C&W days). Back then we had to open a trouble ticket with
Savvis, who opened a trouble ticket with WCOM, who had to open a trouble
ticket with BellSouth. Each step had up to a 1 hour turn-around time,
totaling 3 hours just to get a response, and 3 more hours to get a
resolution. As engineers dealing with engineers, if we had cut out the
middlemen the resolution (in this case a truck roll) would have occurred
sooner and our backhoe'd circuit would have been restored quicker.
The value of a middleman can only be assessed by each consumer. In my
case I don't see the need. YMMV.
-Jim P.
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00820" href="msg00820.html">[ale] comcast static IP?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> rstory-l at revelstone.com (Robert Story)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00869" href="msg00869.html">[ale] comcast static IP?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00878" href="msg00878.html">[ale] comcast static IP?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00896" href="msg00896.html">[ale] comcast static IP?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> rb211 at tds.net (William Bagwell)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00898" href="msg00898.html">[ale] comcast static IP?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00899" href="msg00899.html">[ale] comcast static IP?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> robertheaven at earthlink.net (Robert Heaven)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00900.html">[ale] comcast static IP?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00902.html">[ale] Load...</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00899.html">[ale] comcast static IP?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00903.html">[ale] comcast static IP?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00901"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00901"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>