[no subject]

-Jay

On Monday 24 January 2005 12:01 pm, Geoffrey wrote:
> Jay Loden wrote:
> > Will I need acpi for battery/power management for the laptop though?
>
> Very likely, problem is, support is spotting and some hardware support
> is flakey.
>
> Seems like it's getting better as I move up the 2.6 kernel releases.


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00928" href="msg00928.html">[ale] debian acpi module errors, framebuffer</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jloden at toughguy.net (Jay Loden)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00939" href="msg00939.html">[ale] debian acpi module errors, framebuffer</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jloden at toughguy.net (Jay Loden)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00942" href="msg00942.html">[ale] debian acpi module errors, framebuffer</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01141.html">[ale] Py[h]hon syntax (sic)</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01143.html">[ale] comcast static IP?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00942.html">[ale] debian acpi module errors, framebuffer</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00929.html">[ale] Notification</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#01142"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#01142"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>