[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:55:12 -0500 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: cnhy_gobg ng cpnegjevtug.pbz (Bnhy Qnegjevtug) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1801080.1131729543883.JavaMail.root@mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] RAID recovery -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:55:12 -0500</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: paul_tbot at pcartwright.com (Paul Cartwright)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00189.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00175.html">1801080.1131729543883.JavaMail.root@mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net</a>> <<a href="msg00187.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00189.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] RAID recovery</li>
>
> > It still works. She also has a cell phone
> > that she uses, calling cards, and a few other new gismos. AT&T is
> > where it is today because of a 1984 ruling by Judge Green.
>
> The problem was that it was not equitable. ?Sure, folks had to be
> given a chance to even the playing field, but once that happened,
> they never returned it to true competition. ?I think it was really a
> combination of being ahead of the technology in many cases, look at
> cellular. ?The Labs created the technology, but they couldn't get
> anyone to buy into. ?Now everyone has a cell phone.
lets not even get into the Labs:) what a wonderful wasted resource.
>
> They also made some stupid mistakes. ?All the shuffling around the
> various businesses (cell, local, ld, cable..) ?They spent so much
> time trying to organize this stuff, they missed out on competing
> where they could.
times change. Corporations are way different now, no more "cradle to
grave" idiology, you better build a massive 401K!!
>
> > Now if they
> > would do the same thing for cable companies, the prices might drop
> > there also.
>
> Amen.
glad we agree!
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
X-Request-PGP: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-pcartwright/key.asc">http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-pcartwright/key.asc</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00175" href="msg00175.html">[ale] RAID recovery</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dhurst at mindspring.com (Dow_Hurst)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00187" href="msg00187.html">[ale] RAID recovery</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> paul_tbot at pcartwright.com (Paul Cartwright)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00189" href="msg00189.html">[ale] RAID recovery</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00189.html">[ale] RAID recovery</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00191.html">[ale] RAID recovery</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00189.html">[ale] RAID recovery</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00184.html">[ale] RAID recovery</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00190"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00190"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>