[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:47:30 -0400 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: qpbeova ng znpughegyr.pbz (Rnivq Qbeova) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] A faster Java box - any tips ?? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:47:30 -0400</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: dcorbin at machturtle.com (David Corbin)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00174.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00174.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] A faster Java box - any tips ??</li>
David
On Sunday 09 October 2005 12:33 pm, Greg wrote:
> I am looking for any tips/comments/advice on buying a fast machine to do
> J2EE on. I am developing in Eclipse and working on large web applications
> and it seems that my current box is pretty slow. I am using the one box to
> run my database, run whichever AS/Servlets container I need (JBoss, Resin,
> or plain old Tomcat), and I try to only recompile whatever has changed and
> not the whole thing. I started out with all of my web apps in the same
> workspace but since it slowed it down I now only load one at a time and
> pull up any other pages in another app individually if I need to refer to
> them.
>
> I have tried developing on a dual 64-bit Opteron (2.0 GHz) with 2 GB of
> memory and on a 3.6 GHz HP laptop with 1 GB of memory and the laptop seems
> way faster than the dual box. I have been told that the most important
> thing is clock speed and that using 2 processors is irrelevant. Is this
> correct ? Is AMD's FX line of processors (2.8 GHz) faster than Intel's P4
> (I think around 3.74 GHz) ? Does RAM matter past 1 GB ?? Any opinions of
> using a SCSI HD/PCI card vs. a SATA HD through the motherboard ?
>
> I have tried to Google for an answer to this but have found nothing of
> substance. My knowledge of hardware with regards to processors and Java is
> sadly lacking.
>
> I would appreciate any tips / advice / comments. Thanks,
>
> Greg
>
> - apologies to any that are on the ajug-members list as well as this one.
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00176" href="msg00176.html">[ale] A faster Java box - any tips ??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00174" href="msg00174.html">[ale] A faster Java box - any tips ??</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> runman at speedfactory.net (Greg)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00174.html">[ale] A faster Java box - any tips ??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00176.html">[ale] A faster Java box - any tips ??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00174.html">[ale] A faster Java box - any tips ??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00176.html">[ale] A faster Java box - any tips ??</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00175"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00175"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>