[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:12:29 -0400 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wxvaarl ng ybpnyargfbyhgvbaf.pbz (Xnzrf B. Yvaarl WWW) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Slow connection on Cisco Switch -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:12:29 -0400</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00343.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00338.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00340.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00341.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00342.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00343.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Slow connection on Cisco Switch</li>
Is there a reason that hd should ever be used (assuming all devices are
fd capable)? It seems to me that other than a few, really old modem
protocols and perhaps frame-relay, hd should go the way of the dodo.
Certainly for ethernet traffic.
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 10:15 -0400, Christopher Fowler wrote:
> This problem fixed.
>
> Apparently there was a problem in negotiating duplex. The RH box was
> running at full and the switch at half. I forced the port on the
> switch to be full and a 10m file transfer went from 4m to 1s.
>
> On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 10:03, Christopher Fowler wrote:
> > Okay.
> >
> > I'm connected to the switch.
> >
> > 6w2d: %LINK-4-ERROR: FastEthernet0/8 is experiencing errors
> > Switch#show interface FastEthernet0/8
> > FastEthernet0/8 is up, line protocol is up
> > Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0006.531f.8908 (bia
> > 0006.531f.8908)
> > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
> > reliability 253/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
> > Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
> > Keepalive not set
> > Auto-duplex (Half), Auto Speed (100), 100BaseTX/FX
> > ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
> > Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never
> > Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
> > Queueing strategy: fifo
> > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
> > 5 minute input rate 5000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec
> > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
> > 3793529 packets input, 3007993828 bytes
> > Received 24356 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
> > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
> > 0 watchdog, 0 multicast
> > 0 input packets with dribble condition detected
> > 4792645 packets output, 649608952 bytes, 0 underruns
> > 11682 output errors, 84298 collisions, 1 interface resets
> > 0 babbles, 11694 late collision, 19773 deferred
> > 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
> > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
> >
> > It looks like the port is set for half. I've changed ports and I've
> > changed cables. Is there a way to set the port to FD and see if that
> > helps? Maybe the RH box is running at FD?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 09:36, Christopher Fowler wrote:
> > > Its a 2900 XL. I've not even attempted to configure it. I purchased
> > > off eBay.
> > >
> > > All other computers work well and this thing is fast. I assuming it is
> > > a problem where the switch wants to do FD but the adapter on the RH 7.2
> > > box is failing at that. I had this problem in the past and we had to
> > > tell the Cisco to force HD on that port. I don't know how to do that on
> > > a Cisco. I don't even have the password to the switch. I'm hoping that
> > > the password is not set. I'm building a console cable now to connect to
> > > the console of the Cisco.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 09:31, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 09:14 -0400, Christopher Fowler wrote:
> > > > > I have a RH box attached to a Cisco Switch. The connection seems to
> > > > > work okay when using ssh and protocols that do not send a lot of data.
> > > > > The LED is green indicating 100m connection. The problem is when I
> > > > > scp. When I scp it takes almost 3 minutes to transfer 10m. The LED on
> > > > > the switch is blinking orange and green when this happens. Can anyone
> > > > > tell me what is going on?
> > > >
> > > > Collisions? Does the switch support full duplex or only half? I ran into
> > > > a switch that was collision city until I turned full-duplex to
> > > > half-duplex. Then it sped up quite nicely.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Chris
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Ale mailing list
> > > > > Ale at ale.org
> > > > > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ale mailing list
> > > Ale at ale.org
> > > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
--
James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \ one Linux user /
Local Net Solutions,LLC \ at a time. /
770-493-8244 \.___________________________./
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.localnetsolutions.com">http://www.localnetsolutions.com</a>
GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00338" href="msg00338.html">[ale] Slow connection on Cisco Switch</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00340" href="msg00340.html">[ale] Slow connection on Cisco Switch</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00341" href="msg00341.html">[ale] Slow connection on Cisco Switch</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00342" href="msg00342.html">[ale] Slow connection on Cisco Switch</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00343" href="msg00343.html">[ale] Slow connection on Cisco Switch</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00344.html">[ale] Almost too much of a _Good_Thing_</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00346.html">[ale] CD or not CD</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00343.html">[ale] Slow connection on Cisco Switch</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00339.html">[ale] Brain transplant - SOLVED</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00345"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00345"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>