[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:27:39 -0400 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wxvaarl ng ybpnyargfbyhgvbaf.pbz (Xnzrf B. Yvaarl WWW) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] difference among Seagate, WesternDigital & Maxtor ? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:27:39 -0400</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00508.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00481.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00500.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00503.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00508.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] difference among Seagate, WesternDigital & Maxtor ?</li>
> So, I'm looking for a couple of sizable, at least a couple hundred MBs, hard
> drives that I can reliably [and affordably] raid, somehow. I've read that
> [IIRC] Escalade raid cards are good. But I have no objection to software raid
> in that reliability and avoiding data loss are what I'm after, with
> performance last, at least in this instance.
>
> Your thoughts appreciated,
I am rather partial to software RAID over hardware. The performance loss
due to software is very well compensated for by the compatibility issues
of not being tied to a specific hardware RAID vendor's card.
A common setup that I use just for data redundancy (and some speed boost
on reads) is a simple mirrored drive using a pair of different model
drives. I'll partition them so the drives have a large partition (or
two) of the same size. The unmirrored portion will be /boot, and /. I
use the mirrored partitions for the data portion that are not from a CD.
Oh. I almost forgot. I tend to spec SCSI for systems where downtime is
not an option (and I have ample fan space in the box). SCSI drives have
a 5 year warranty (for a good reason). The best of the SATA drives
(seagate w/8MB cache 7200 rpm) have a 3. The best of the IDE drives
(seagate w/8MB cache 7200rpm) have a 3 as well. Since the bandwidth from
the PCI bus is 4-6 time faster than a SATA drive, a 4 drive SATA card
will make maximum use of the bus system. Now the bottleneck is disk IO.
I have had nothing but grief from Maxtor drives. I have not spec'd a
Maxtor SCI.
--
James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \ one Linux user /
Local Net Solutions,LLC \ at a time. /
770-493-8244 \.___________________________./
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.localnetsolutions.com">http://www.localnetsolutions.com</a>
GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00512" href="msg00512.html">[ale] difference among Seagate, WesternDigital & Maxtor ?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> nym.bnm at gmail.com (Brian MacLeod)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00481" href="msg00481.html">[ale] difference among Seagate, WesternDigital & Maxtor ?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cc.thomas at earthlink.net (Courtney Thomas)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00500" href="msg00500.html">[ale] difference among Seagate, WesternDigital & Maxtor ?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> tejus at vijedi.net (tejus at vijedi.net)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00503" href="msg00503.html">[ale] difference among Seagate, WesternDigital & Maxtor ?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hscast at charter.net (Scott Castaline)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00508" href="msg00508.html">[ale] difference among Seagate, WesternDigital & Maxtor ?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cc.thomas at earthlink.net (Courtney Thomas)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00509.html">[ale] Connecting with SUSE 10.0</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00511.html">[ale] difference among Seagate, WesternDigital & Maxtor ?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00508.html">[ale] difference among Seagate, WesternDigital & Maxtor ?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00512.html">[ale] difference among Seagate, WesternDigital & Maxtor ?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00510"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00510"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>