[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:36:59 -0400 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: zcjevtug ng fcrrqsnpgbel.arg ([nex Ievtug) -->
- <!--x-message-id: E6CC93A6-5EB3-45E4-BA6A-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 7737900E-B91A-42FD-A1C6-[email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Laptop too slow -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:36:59 -0400</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: mpwright at speedfactory.net (Mark Wright)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00427.html">[email protected]</a>> <[email protected]></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Laptop too slow</li>
thanks
Mark
On Oct 25, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Joe Knapka wrote:
> Mark Wright <mpwright at speedfactory.net> writes:
>
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In my role as computer super hero to my friends in the clutches of
>> the evil empire I get to wipe failing windows installations a lot. I
>> have a friend's comaq laptop with a AMD processor running a little
>> over 500 mhz and 28 meg of ram. Win 98 had gotten so twisted it
>> would boot and hang. Virus checker was negative but that was just
>> for fun, the formatter was coming no matter.
>>
>> After installing ubuntu 5.10 and adding 128 M of mem the laptop runs
>> but is very slow. Slower than (or as) a 266 mhz laptop I keep
>> around. I ran memtest on it first and after the memory install and
>> the hardware seems OK. Memtest does report that the AMD processor
>> has only L1 cache and no L2. Is this right or is the cpu broke?
>>
>
> If L2 is disabled, the machine will be dramatically slower. I used to
> run a firewall on a 75MHz Pentium with blown L2 cache (I "know" this
> because it would not boot, nor pass Memtest86, with L2 enabled), and
> my 25MHz 486 was faster.
>
> I disabled the L2 on that machine using the "BIOS features" page of
> the CMOS setup utility. You might check there for a similar setting on
> your laptop.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- J Knapka
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00540" href="msg00540.html">[ale] Laptop too slow</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00427" href="msg00427.html">[ale] Laptop too slow</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mpwright at speedfactory.net (Mark Wright)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00501" href="msg00501.html">[ale] Laptop too slow</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jknapka at kneuro.net (Joe Knapka)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00508.html">[ale] difference among Seagate, WesternDigital & Maxtor ?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00521.html">[ale] Connecting with SUSE 10.0</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00501.html">[ale] Laptop too slow</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00540.html">[ale] Laptop too slow</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00516"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00516"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>