[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]



>Brian Hartsfield wrote:
>  
>
>>On 9/5/05, Geoffrey <esoteric at 3times25.net> wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Brian Hartsfield wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>What is somebody is absent-minded (like myself) and simply forgets to 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>send
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>the thing back? Have I now broken the law?
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>As laws go, in general, yes. If you're driving down the road and you
>>>forget the speed limit is 45 and you're caught doing 65, you will get a
>>>ticket.
>>>      
>>>
>>My problem with that is that normal rebates are based on the assumption that 
>>most people will not take the time to send it in. Now you make a "prebate" 
>>and the same assumption has to apply - that most people are not going to 
>>send it in. So what is the point?
>>    
>>
>
>No, it's certainly different.  When you get a rebate coupon, that's all 
>you have.  You have gained no value.  With the prebate, they are giving 
>you the value up front with a promise that you'll do your part when the 
>time comes.
>
>  
>
>>To sue people who don't follow 
>>instructions to the letter or just the people who refill?
>>    
>>
>
>Good question.  It depends on the wording.
>
>  
>
>>The example is not 
>>a good analogy since if you are driving it is easy to control you speed.
>>Here, you are forcing people to go out of their way to do something (mail a 
>>cartridge back) which is not part of their normal routine.
>>    
>>
>
>Driving the speed  limit may not be a part of their routine either. 
>I've always had a heavy foot and have to work at driving within the 
>legal speed limit.
>
>  
>
>>A better car 
>>anology would be telling people if they are out of gas they cannot stop 
>>anywhere but have to come to station X to refuel even if that is out of 
>>their way.
>>    
>>
>
>Sounds like a Microsoft solution. :)  If you make such a stupid legal 
>agreement, then you are likely bound by it.  IANAL, so don't take that 
>to court on my account.
>
>I don't know the whole story, but I'd doubt that they'll sue folks who 
>fail to return, more likely, those who refill.  I really don't know. 
>I'm not saying it's right mind you, I was addressing the question of 
>breaking the law.
>
>Consumers simply need to react with their wallet.  Don't buy their 
>products and let them know why, every chance you get.
>
>  
>
>>I still don't like this prebate thing at all.
>>    
>>
>
>I don't either.
>
>  
>
Sounds to me like,  If you have a Lexmark printer.  You need to pay cash 
for your ink.   Mine was a gift.  I will NEVER buy a product from them.  
Just because of the last lawsuit they did to a ink cart. remanufactor.  
They want to be in their own world let them.  And whenever someone ask 
me about Lexmark printers, they get my recommendations.

Adrin





</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00114" href="msg00114.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00088" href="msg00088.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> rsj at radio.org (Randal Jarrett K4RSJ)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00090" href="msg00090.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> audilover at speedfactory.net (Raylynn Knight)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00091" href="msg00091.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00096" href="msg00096.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00098" href="msg00098.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> hbbs at comcast.net (Jeff Hubbs)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00101" href="msg00101.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00102" href="msg00102.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> krandor1 at gmail.com (Brian Hartsfield)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00103" href="msg00103.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00105" href="msg00105.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> krandor1 at gmail.com (Brian Hartsfield)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00110" href="msg00110.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00111.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00113.html">[ale] OT: Speedfactory dropping USENET news</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00111.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00114.html">[ale] Refill ink cartridge, go to jail!!</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00112"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00112"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>