[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] OT Linux Sys Admin needed



Raylynn Knight wrote:

>On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 22:50 -0400, fostermail at bellsouth.net wrote:
>  
>
>>Only Math\Co Fords had 287's
>>
>>    
>>
>Ford had the 272, 289 and 292 cubic inch V-8's (in the range near 287).
>Don't believe they ever made a 287.  The closest to that displacement
>that Chevy had was a 283.  The only 287 I can recall was the Rambler nee
>AMC.  I once had a 1965 Rambler Marlin with a 287 V8, sold it so I could
>buy the 1964 GTO (389 - 2 4-barrels, 4-speed) which I shortly after
>rapped around a telephone pole.  Was racing and the brakes just didn't
>match the acceleration!!!
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>  
>
Well, I had to go look that up.   I drove a 78 Malibu for a little while 
and couldn't remember what the Ci was for that Engine.  Some of the auto 
parts dealers don't even list this size V8.  Maybe GM paid them too.  
Yes, I am talking about the 267.   What a waste and a bend under 
pressure from the government that engine was,  unlike the 289 that FORD 
made.  I hope they don't still make the 267.


http://www.ajgeneral.com/sbc_block_casting_numbers 

And since we are on Auto's this week.   I am so excited about what Audi 
did.  Is anyone else??   I look for them to be shut out of racing again 
soon.  The crybabies will start with the unfair advantage soon. See the 
Audi R10 on their website.

Adrin