[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] OT Linux Sys Admin needed
Raylynn Knight wrote:
>On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 22:50 -0400, fostermail at bellsouth.net wrote:
>
>
>>Only Math\Co Fords had 287's
>>
>>
>>
>Ford had the 272, 289 and 292 cubic inch V-8's (in the range near 287).
>Don't believe they ever made a 287. The closest to that displacement
>that Chevy had was a 283. The only 287 I can recall was the Rambler nee
>AMC. I once had a 1965 Rambler Marlin with a 287 V8, sold it so I could
>buy the 1964 GTO (389 - 2 4-barrels, 4-speed) which I shortly after
>rapped around a telephone pole. Was racing and the brakes just didn't
>match the acceleration!!!
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org
>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>
>
Well, I had to go look that up. I drove a 78 Malibu for a little while
and couldn't remember what the Ci was for that Engine. Some of the auto
parts dealers don't even list this size V8. Maybe GM paid them too.
Yes, I am talking about the 267. What a waste and a bend under
pressure from the government that engine was, unlike the 289 that FORD
made. I hope they don't still make the 267.
http://www.ajgeneral.com/sbc_block_casting_numbers
And since we are on Auto's this week. I am so excited about what Audi
did. Is anyone else?? I look for them to be shut out of racing again
soon. The crybabies will start with the unfair advantage soon. See the
Audi R10 on their website.
Adrin