[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] I've hit a rough wall, installin' Smoothwall :-)
- Subject: [ale] I've hit a rough wall, installin' Smoothwall :-)
- From: lists at serioustechnology.com (Geoffrey)
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:13:10 -0500
- In-reply-to: <4E4B3438124C40F3B203502C5567B759@VISTA>
- References: <1DFE880158754AD2916F82BEC6993C37@CourtneyPC><[email protected]><08EA07878EAA4B728A92CBD4C0742B52@VISTA><[email protected]><E6A7F3146CC043478040F05C617E2085@VISTA><[email protected]><CA35388096384DA3A581EA5C26A6B4BA@VISTA> <1230010954.9611.7.camel@square> <4E4B3438124C40F3B203502C5567B759@VISTA>
Courtney Thomas wrote:
> Brian,
>
> Thank you kindly for the analysis offer.
>
> Might the following yield the answer as well ?
>
> Can I not do a traceroute using the 's' option, if I recall correctly, to
> see what route the "wireless LAN members" are using, hence seeing if they
> are
> actually [LAN -> internet] first examined by SmoothWall before exiting the
> LAN to the internet, and alternatively [internet -> LAN] first router then
> SmoothWall processing ?
>
> I've not tried this as I'm in the middle of several other things that
> prohibit this right now but'll try sometime this week.
>
> Doing as you request.....
>
> modem <------> wireless router <-------> hub <---------> SmoothWall ethernet
> NIC [Green]
> ^
> |
> |
> v
> SmoothWall NIC [Red]
This makes no sense. I think the wrapping screwed up your diagram. Just
the same, I'd put the smoothie between the modem and the wireless router.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin