[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Do browsers treat secure sites differently WRT style?
- Subject: [ale] Do browsers treat secure sites differently WRT style?
- From: sean.mcnealy at gmail.com (Sean McNealy)
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:13:11 -0500
- In-reply-to: <1230489095.14282.3.camel@square>
- References: <[email protected]> <1230489095.14282.3.camel@square>
You actually have a better idea than me, there. But an even simpler
answer should not be overlooked.
The page may reference the stylesheet through the full
"http://website.com/..." url (the "http" being bad here), which some
browsers would correctly decide to overlook since it would be outside an
ssl channel. The stylesheet may be local to the site or even on a
remote site for this to happen.
-Sean
Brian Pitts wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 06:47 -0500, Jim Lynch wrote:
>
>> I have a static page that renders differently under ssl than normal. I
>> have no idea why. The page has styles for some of the elements but not
>> the one that is different. A table served by ssl has the same default
>> background color as the rest of the page. When it is being served by
>> plain Apache, the background is white.
>>
>> Any idea why? Konqueror does the same thing, ditto Opera and IE6.
>>
>
> Do you have an external stylesheet for the table on a subdomain where
> the ssl certificate isn't valid?
>
> -Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>