[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] [OT?] email signature etiquette
- Subject: [ale] [OT?] email signature etiquette
- From: ecashin at noserose.net (Ed Cashin)
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:30:39 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAEo=5Pw7VMR2F191Y_2MMGBvUYy=GnLpNHp=GYL9wKXBDOnOMA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAEo=5Pw7VMR2F191Y_2MMGBvUYy=GnLpNHp=GYL9wKXBDOnOMA@mail.gmail.com>
I'm a bit old fashioned and default to the four lines suggested by RFC 1855,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855
... but I follow Postel's Law here, being liberal in what I receive. Folks
these days have all kinds of crazy sigs. :)
Wikipedia helped me find that RFC again, and it has some more interesting
info on sigs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature_block
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote:
> What is a "reasonable length" for an email signature? Someone I know
> almost has their resume as their sig. Makes their emails quite
> lengthy.
>
> --
> --
> James P. Kinney III
>
> Every time you stop a school, you will have to build a jail. What you
> gain at one end you lose at the other. It's like feeding a dog on his
> own tail. It won't fatten the dog.
> - Speech 11/23/1900 Mark Twain
>
> http://electjimkinney.org
> http://heretothereideas.blogspot.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
--
Ed Cashin <ecashin at noserose.net>
http://noserose.net/e/
http://www.coraid.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20121126/f0067e86/attachment.html>