[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Private Distributed Hash Tables
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Private Distributed Hash Tables
- From: [email protected] (rysiek)
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:52:07 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CADJYzxLps1dL_7gXdvh1rPt1HMQRb3YYgE3xcWX5ORwY=EjOgQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CADJYzxKcXjW-z9eRXHs+ujEEn-H0q8EyA6==T+x0DVATwHvM3w@mail.gmail.com> <1894233.dKfDltdh6N@lap> <CADJYzxLps1dL_7gXdvh1rPt1HMQRb3YYgE3xcWX5ORwY=EjOgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dnia Å?roda, 8 stycznia 2014 13:46:15 Rich Jones pisze:
> I suppose RetroShare and GNUnet are similar in that they have 'Friend to
> Friend' capabilities, but as we see in practice, they don't create
> high-quality networks because there is no hierarchy of trust or
> discoverability of new users - by default, users can't interact with
> 'friends-of-friends', which means that what should be "Private P2P"
> networks degrade to "Group P2P" networks of only a few people. This
> proposed system should be able to accommodate thousands of users while
> still providing the aforementioned benefits.
RetroShare, from what I understand, is going to provide "friend-of-a-friend"
connectivity... kind of:
http://retroshare.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/INVITE_PROP2_SERVICE
But yes, I see your point now.
--
Pozdr
rysiek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140108/8ad26acd/attachment.sig>