Re: ​ Re: Threat Model: Parents

[softservant@gmail.com (Softy)]

> That's just a slippery slope to accepting the paternalism of the state,
> man. This thread continues to deliver.
>
>

trollollolollo ... one can never tell via plain text.
â??
I suppose I should have elaborated on the distinction between Child and
State.
Evidently, confusion exists on
â??limitsâ??
the former should govern
â?? withâ??
and how the latter needs governing (and yes, at times by the former).

â??Now we're going to get the CPS nuts about their kids being carried away in
black vans; but that's not where I'm going.  I'm laying the claim that
'developing children' need to have a certain amount of 'oversight and
governance' in their lives.  I'm happy knowing various governmental and
non- are monitoring the milk my son drinks so it doesn't contain large
doses of melamine (for instance).â??

â??â??
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150601/3d0bb1f2/attachment.html>