[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Threat Model: Parents
- To: Lodewijk andré de la porte <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Threat Model: Parents
- From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:52:16 +0300
- Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Softy <[email protected]>
- In-reply-to: <CAHWD2r+7kgE=7uY-7GWTvpi8o23=w2Cvg_Qn7epFUfrAUwgbbw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAGkjMSOsecZCSomT=Rv0h2nZPQOFcK1L2Yc9V5T54Orf-27i1w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHWD2r+7kgE=7uY-7GWTvpi8o23=w2Cvg_Qn7epFUfrAUwgbbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:34:07AM +0900, Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote:
> 2015-06-03 0:42 GMT+09:00 Softy <[email protected]>:
>
> > â??Arguably a category of child which would benefit from a concerned adults
> > supervision.
> >
> > I would never assert an alcoholic should choose a bar as their favourite
> > hangout - nor would I claim they have no right to choose to do so.
> > However, I would assert (to the alcoholic) they would be better off going
> > to said bar with a helpful supervisor/friend.â??
> >
>
> I would argue the alcoholic is best assigned a personal police officer and
> psychologist, to keep him in check and positive. In fact; everyone needs a
> personal police officer and psychologist.
>
>
Dude, I am pretty sure your view is not popular in east
europe and/or russia.
"a personal police" for each alcoholic likely means
almost all of police are alcoholics too (in case they
are natives).
--
We don't need no education
We don't need no thought control