[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
progression of technologies
2015-06-25 21:44 GMT+09:00 z9wahqvh <[email protected]>:
> this is absolutely tremendous, original, and insightful. in my opinion.
This is exceedingly strange coming from an In-Q-Tel security officer.
In-Q-Tel basically invests in anything performing more collections in the
US. Does Dan Geer worry for the future, and effectively betray In-Q-Tel?
Does he want to prevent anyone *else* from getting the nice intel? What
exactly does he want to make information processors liable for?
How can law prevent third parties associating freely available information?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150626/b84169f4/attachment.html>