[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Electronic Freedom Foundation selective in support of freedom
- To: Ryan Carboni <[email protected]>, cpunks <[email protected]>
- Subject: Electronic Freedom Foundation selective in support of freedom
- From: [email protected] (Sean Lynch)
- Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 22:32:07 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CAO7N=i1uHKSUWdaYTOJ=m6XPjaj6Dc-HR5mxifhJJG7AX1_j2g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAO7N=i1uHKSUWdaYTOJ=m6XPjaj6Dc-HR5mxifhJJG7AX1_j2g@mail.gmail.com>
These occurred five years apart, and only the second one involved an actual
court case. I don't think it's a reasonable comparison.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:21 PM Ryan Carboni <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/how-lieberman-got-amazon-to-drop-wikileaks
>
> The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a group that advocates for Internet
> freedom of speech by defending court cases, said the axing certainly
> doesn't violate the First Amendment. But it is, according to senior staff
> attorney Kevin Bankston, "disappointing."
>
>
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/12/sheriffs-threats-against-credit-card-companies-violate-first-amendment
>
> As we wrote about last month, we submitted an amicus brief to the Seventh
> Circuit arguing that government officials such as Sheriff Dart may not use
> their positions of authority to coerce companies with express or implied
> threats of legal liability into taking actions that censor speechâ??whether
> online or offline.
>
>
>
>
> As we all know, escort services are important, not Wikileaks, whose
> founder makes use of the CIA's escort service with expected results.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160106/46a7c0f0/attachment.html>