[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Chaum Fathers Bastard Child To RubberHose ... PrivaTegrity cMix
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Chaum Fathers Bastard Child To RubberHose ... PrivaTegrity cMix
- From: [email protected] (juan)
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 04:56:06 -0300
- In-reply-to: <1459982.3lZuYZRVEL@tc-secure>
- References: <CAH8YiRGYsoD8+SY9ykMBrSP-d0ewoJKpesf8G1aw_KLb-3u=5Q@mail.gmail.com> <2637825.fEraJcxBr0@tc-secure> <[email protected]> <1459982.3lZuYZRVEL@tc-secure>
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:30:49 -0800
Alex Stahl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Point is the technology is neutral/agnostic to its location and
> operator - and that a key part of the solution is in fact political.
Oh yes, I do see that. And it's based on the
'division-of-power' and 'checks-and-balances' doctrine, which I
don't find especially convincing or effective.
>
> Hell, I'm still wondering who would use such a system in the first
> place without the imposition of regulation?
Well, the leaders of the liberal democracies might be able to
create a few laws and regulations to adopt chaum's system and
save the children from digital terrorism. Or something.
>
> On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 3:31:49 AM PST juan wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:15:36 -0800
> >
> > Alex Stahl <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Second, he implied that, with the use of these policies, if a
> > > message were to traverse a network with nodes operated by the US,
> > > Canada, Egypt, India, Pakistan, Iran, Russia, China and Japan,
> >
> > I think the actual network would be more like washington,
> > boston, new york, los angeles, london, panama, puerto rico,
> > marshal islands and maybe brussels.
>
>