[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Chaum Fathers Bastard Child To RubberHose ... PrivaTegrity cMix
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Chaum Fathers Bastard Child To RubberHose ... PrivaTegrity cMix
- From: [email protected] (Shawn K. Quinn)
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 21:30:16 -0600
- In-reply-to: <2637825.fEraJcxBr0@tc-secure>
- References: <CAH8YiRGYsoD8+SY9ykMBrSP-d0ewoJKpesf8G1aw_KLb-3u=5Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAKtE3zficYU=uVsx45bBruzo-1n6xYM5BgjbPoVArjrTb8gG6g@mail.gmail.com> <2637825.fEraJcxBr0@tc-secure>
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 22:15 -0800, Alex Stahl wrote:
> Second, he implied that, with the use of these policies, if a message
> were to traverse a network with nodes operated by the US, Canada,
> Egypt, India, Pakistan, Iran, Russia, China and Japan, it would
> require the admins from those countries to all agree to decrypt,
> turning the solution into a political - not mathematical - one.
The whole point of cryptography is to be secure against political
problems such as this. Despite whatever good Chaum may be known for,
this is bad, and not something I will ever use if I can possibly help
it.
>
--
Shawn K. Quinn <[email protected]>