[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The Moon landing again - Fw: Neil Armstrong's Boots
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: The Moon landing again - Fw: Neil Armstrong's Boots
- From: [email protected] (Rayzer)
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:51:29 -0700
- In-reply-to: <20160712140702.GD4387@r4>
- References: <20160711234912.GK30352@x220-a02> <CAMc=dv=qQwN7bkn3OLOBEFVV7H8_Zg7dNZK6ETNQy5zcOJPtvg@mail.gmail.com> <20160712132810.GC4387@r4> <[email protected]> <20160712140702.GD4387@r4>
On 07/12/2016 07:07 AM, Tom wrote:
>>> No atmosphere, no blowing.
>> He's talking about the module thrusters, you don't need
>> atmosphere to blow particles on the ground.
> Ok. It's been debunked anyway:
> http://space.stackexchange.com/questions/1691/why-didnt-the-apollo-11-lander-blow-the-dust-away-or-why-does-it-look-like-it
>
>
> - Tom
>
Well I stand corrected. It was the "Electrical opposite" of what I
stated in my last post.
Positive Ionic charge, not negative.
Rr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160712/c98b6658/attachment.sig>