[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives?
From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:08:02 +0300
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]$> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 08:34:05AM -0700, Rayzer wrote:
> dissent,
> riffle,
> i2p,
> mixminion
> pynchon-gate
> percy++
> 
> NONE of these are intended for the same target audience as tor. IOW NONE
> of the above could CONCEIVABLY be used by a journalist or
> computer-illiterate dissident in Tanzania right NOW.
>

Aren't the shiny features easy to do if there is core functionality?

Given socks proxy or network interface it is trivial.

Follow-Ups:
- Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives?
  - From: [email protected] (Rayzer)

References:
- Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives?
  - From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)
- Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives?
  - From: [email protected] (stef)
- Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives?
  - From: [email protected] (Rayzer)

Prev by Date: the most annoying thing about Juan
Next by Date: the most annoying thing about Juan
Previous by thread: Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives?
Next by thread: Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread