[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

To: [email protected]
Subject: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security
From: [email protected] (grarpamp)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:05:57 -0400
Cc: cpunks <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <652210562.2768097.1468453881242.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkfgVYU_T9w0SJ9QsqSo8EXHgbJx68hROb6E8ELsrS2J6W6kg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkfgVbkpVVxe1xzhVSPRLdGUEEFt+KknE1xdYcH-zLa0gMEkg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkfgVbLk=q1c65KffvSiWZ-Ffu4j2Mv+CiR-2m7oogU9YjpbQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkfgVYsmnGPLsWmR3Lmc+U22eWziazgPjbzkyOzwJrV03vuMg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti28nYv-UdvnsZz1NsQYgScTAUBTdokrbd+5cyeVfsLAUxA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On 7/19/16, Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote:
> I doubt that they hire anons :(

US IRS rules prevent that to such degree that any btc anons get
beyond trivial limits will not be coming from the audited corporate
wallet. While tor may be hodling legacy btc, donations are currently
going via bitpay probably set to convert it all straight to usd with
no holdback. Nor does tor corp have any real need for anons. And
even if the board welcomed anons philosophically, lawyers would
probably block it citing risk, liability, and other scary stuff.

References:
- [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security
  - From: [email protected] (Mirimir)

Prev by Date: Call for input to President's Commission on Enhancing Cybersecurity
Next by Date: Attempted coup d'etat in Turkey - probable conclusion
Previous by thread: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security
Next by thread: Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread