Two Different Instructors On Using Tor Crypto Etc...

[rayzer@riseup.net (Rayzer)]

On 07/21/2016 01:26 AM, Mirimir wrote:
> On 07/20/2016 10:03 AM, Rayzer wrote:
>>
>> On 07/19/2016 02:31 AM, Mirimir wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2016 03:39 PM, juan wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:45:19 -0600 Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My current working hypothesis is that Tor is not
>>>>> broken/breakable by design.
>>>> keep sucking mirimir - your friend syverson isn't fully 
>>>> satisfied yet.
>>> He's not my friend, Juan. He works for the fucking US Navy, after
>>> all.
>>>
>>> But I do respect him. Think about it. He and his friends got US
>>> military funding for a project that provided deniable and secure
>>> communication, but only by making it public, for use by both
>>> funders and their enemies.
>>>
>>> It might be that this vulnerability was crucial for selling it to
>>> US military. But that's distinguishable from the argument that
>>> it's intentionally designed to be vulnerable. There's also the
>>> fact that nobody has come up with anything practical that's not
>>> vulnerable to global adversaries. So it seems unlikely that he
>>> had such a design that he put aside as unsellable.
>>>
>>>
>> You're arguing logically with a brain-dead troll Mirimir...
> I don't consider Juan to be a troll. I get that he doesn't have much
> patience with those whom he sees as fools :) But being considered a
> fool has never bothered me ;) It's my favorite Tarot card.
>
>