[Captive-portals] Which portion of packet is used for capport enforcement?

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

Subject: [Captive-portals] Which portion of packet is used for capport enforcement?

From: Kyle Larose <[email protected]>

Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 16:51:16 +0000

Accept-language: en-US

Archived-at: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/wsvQ-Ny5p_wCWBI7BeTZ-lvYnsk>

Delivered-to: [email protected]

List-archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>

List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>

List-id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>

List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>

List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Thread-index: AQHTs9jJPVc8a+E/IkWoymTos701KA==

Thread-topic: Which portion of packet is used for capport enforcement?

Issue number 5 (https://github.com/capport-wg/architecture/issues/5) against the captive portal architecture raises the question of which portion of the packet to use for capport enforcement. I have uploaded a change to the architecture repo to attempt to address this issue: https://github.com/capport-wg/architecture/pull/9.

Feel free to read over the pull request and give feedback.

Thanks!

Kyle

Disclaimer:
This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is considered confidential, proprietary, sensitive and/or otherwise legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication. Thank you for your cooperation.