[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
> While Illinois had a 7094 with 2 1401s when I got there (which was
> interesting to code), they also had the asynchronous Illiac II, and
> within a couple of years a 360/75 and /50 (which was a mess to
> code), the fabulous B5500 was not only a revelation, but an
> inspiration.
>
> With it you learned the power of good design over mediocre design.
i do not believe the illiacs had comms, but i did not use them. we only
drove up north for chinese food. we got the bends above muddy waters on
43rd.
by the time the /50 nd /75 were out, coms controllers, though not
inexpensive, were well sub-astronomic in costs. but you're past
carterfone time. perhaps the lowering costs were an effect of
carterphone.
my memory is that the B1700, a very interesting machine, had affordable
comms. but i do not remember comms for barton's 5500. algol not ascii!
randy
- References:
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- From: johnnyryan1 at gmail.com (Johnny RYAN)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- From: dhc2 at dcrocker.net (Dave CROCKER)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- From: spencer at mcsr-labs.org (Spencer Dawkins)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- From: jeanjour at comcast.net (John Day)
- Prev by Date:
[ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- Next by Date:
[ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- Previous by thread:
[ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- Next by thread:
[ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- Index(es):