[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ih] trailer encapsulation, was IPv4 address size debate
- Subject: [ih] trailer encapsulation, was IPv4 address size debate
- From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- Date: 14 Nov 2009 03:52:31 -0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
> > There was at least one implementation of Ethernet (MIT? IIRC) that put
> > the Ethernet header at the *back end* of the packet on the wire - i.e.,
> > it became a trailer rather than a header.
>
>Ah, no. That was Berzerkley. (See RFC 893.) (Gratuitous comment suppressed... ;-)
Trailer encapsulation was part of 4.2BSD, and it was a significant win
on the VAX, which had fairly slow memory and tiny 512 byte pages. The
data part of the packets was padded to a multiple of 512 bytes so it
could be moved around both within the kernel and into user space by
adjusting page table entries rather than by copying.
R's,
John