[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ih] IP addresses are not phone numbers, was Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership

Subject: [ih] IP addresses are not phone numbers, was Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership
From: ernesto at cs.fiu.edu (Ernie Rubi)
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:21:52 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Thats an interesting thought, but under what legal authority? Or just a community effort with no real enforcement bite?

On Oct 17, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Tony Li <tony.li at tony.li> wrote:

> One thought that has been in the hallways is establishing a routing arbiter function, analogous to IANA that would help coordinate where proxy aggregation would occur.

Follow-Ups:
- [ih] IP addresses are not phone numbers, was Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership
  - From: tony.li at tony.li (Tony Li)

References:
- [ih] Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership
  - From: richard at bennett.com (Richard Bennett)
- [ih] IP addresses are not phone numbers, was Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- [ih] IP addresses are not phone numbers, was Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership
  - From: AMaitland at Commerco.Com (Alan J Maitland)
- [ih] IP addresses are not phone numbers, was Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John R. Levine)
- [ih] IP addresses are not phone numbers, was Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership
  - From: tony.li at tony.li (Tony Li)

Prev by Date: [ih] IP addresses are not phone numbers, was Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership
Next by Date: [ih] IP addresses are not phone numbers, was Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership
Previous by thread: [ih] IP addresses are not phone numbers, was Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership
Next by thread: [ih] IP addresses are not phone numbers, was Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread