[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ih] theory and practice of RFCs?
- Subject: [ih] theory and practice of RFCs?
- From: tony.li at tony.li (Tony Li)
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 09:31:42 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CAPv4CP9vcfxGCGHivp7dEE+Bgp=U59h2iDwMFbT-jjtR5jN=Kw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPv4CP9vcfxGCGHivp7dEE+Bgp=U59h2iDwMFbT-jjtR5jN=Kw@mail.gmail.com>
On Dec 16, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Scott Brim <scott.brim at gmail.com> wrote:
> Miles: If the audience you want to reach is small enough that you can
> do so directly, do so first, and then create an RFC with all of their
> backing (best way to succeed). If the audience is wider than that,
> you need to reach out, and an individual draft is not a bad first step
> for finding out who has a stake.
I'll second this. I'd also suggest submitting it to the relevant IETF/IRTF group as well.
While I do understand and echo some of the comments about the inability of the I*TF to make forward progress, I'm not yet to the point that I've given up on the process completely. It would seem like parallel execution of both in-band and out-of-band approaches would be expedient and optimal.
Regards,
Tony