[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ih] XEROX/PUP and Commercialization (was Re: FYI - Gordon Crovitz/WSJ on "Who Really Invented the Internet?")
- Subject: [ih] XEROX/PUP and Commercialization (was Re: FYI - Gordon Crovitz/WSJ on "Who Really Invented the Internet?")
- From: dhc2 at dcrocker.net (Dave Crocker)
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:14:15 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAJLkZPnoFe1-wY=F8qitsS4V86VTtwAVcHLsG6X2EnBN4Wkqfg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAJLkZPnoFe1-wY=F8qitsS4V86VTtwAVcHLsG6X2EnBN4Wkqfg@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/29/2012 2:00 PM, Jack Haverty wrote:
> If Xerox, or IBM, or Novell, CCITT/ISO, or any of the other
> contemporary competitors building internet technology had done the
> same things, The Internet today might be running on X.25/X.75, or
> carrying PUPs, or using SPX/IPX, instead of TCP/IP.
As a diffusion of innovation theoretical exercise, this might hypothesis
might we worth considering.
I could easily believe that XNS was capability of enjoying the same fate
as what developed for TCP/IP. I don't know what changes Novell made to
their XNS, nee SPX/IPX, but if it wasn't too bad, I'll class that as
fate-sharing with XNS.
I don't believe for one minute that X.25/X.75 were capable of the kind
of usage TCP/IP has experienced. The complexity and limitations they
imposed seem to me to require massively more expensive and massively
less flexible, robust, etc., etc., operation.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net