[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ih] "Subnet"

Subject: [ih] "Subnet"
From: dave.walden.family at gmail.com (dave.walden.family at gmail.com)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 19:51:47 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On May 10, 2012, at 7:11 PM, "Bernie Cosell" <bernie at fantasyfarm.com> wrote:
> Well, I don't think there was any 'subnet'ing with the ARPAnet 

Well, I vaguely remember there was in some other sense -- logical subnets, a seldom used, if ever, feature where the IMPs could let a subset of hosts only communicate with each other.  Or, instead of a vague memory, do I have a wrong memory?    (Of course this is irrelevant to the distinction previously being discussed.)
>

Follow-Ups:
- [ih] "Subnet"
  - From: vint at google.com (Vint Cerf)
- [ih] "Subnet"
  - From: matthias at baerwolff.de (Matthias Bärwolff)

References:
- [ih] "Subnet"
  - From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
- [ih] "Subnet"
  - From: bernie at fantasyfarm.com (Bernie Cosell)

Prev by Date: [ih] Hesitating to disagree with one of the fath ers of the InternetS..
Next by Date: [ih] Hesitating to disagree with one of the fathers of the Internet..
Previous by thread: [ih] "Subnet"
Next by thread: [ih] "Subnet"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread