[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ih] Why did congestion happen at all? Re: why did CC happen at all?
- Subject: [ih] Why did congestion happen at all? Re: why did CC happen at all?
- From: jeanjour at comcast.net (John Day)
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:44:05 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
At 10:17 AM -0400 9/1/14, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > From: Detlef Bosau <detlef.bosau at web.de>
>
> > What is precisely the difference between flow control and congestion
> > control?
That is in the spirit of what I have been using:
Flow control is where feedback is co-located with the resource being
controlled.
Congestion control is where feedback is not co-located with the
resource being controlled.
Remove as many specifics about the implementation as possible.
John
>
>I think it would be hard to beat the definitions given in Davies' '72 paper:
>
>Flow control is about end-to-end control on individual 'connections' (in the
>generic sense of the term, i.e. not limited to a reliable stream); i.e. for
>the transmitter to make sure it does not send data faster than the ultimate
>consumer can deal with it.
>
>Congestion control is about too much traffic being offered to _the network_
>between them, and often involves the interaction of _multiple_ connections
>(although a single connection can cause network congestion on its own, if the
>ends can produce/consume data faster than the network between them can carry
>it across.
>
> Noel