[ih] Peter Salus / Baran's work

[dave.walden.family at gmail.com (Dave Walden)]

ARPANET always had adaptive routing, and it was 
pretty good for the job for a while.  Later, the 
old ARPANET "distance vector" routing was 
replaced by the new ARPANET "link state" 
routing.  These routing algorithms *did* work 
around damage or other changes to the 
"environment", i.e., phone lines and packet 
switching going up and down, changes to the 
network configuration of phone lines and 
packet-switch sites, etc.  As things moved beyond 
the ARPANET, i.e., the Internet came into being 
and expanded, lots more routing work happened, as I remember.

At 01:21 PM 1/13/2015, Bill Ricker wrote:
???Hmm, that makes sense.?
>(D)ARPAnet initially had fixed routing, not 
>useful in damage-prone environment.
>It was ???TCP/IP that introduced adaptive routing around damage.?
>(USEnet evolved adaptive routing, i don't recall how that was related .)
>
>Also note that the Military nearly adopted the 
>ISO OSI protocol stack not the TCP/IP Internet 
>stack, even though DARPA had subsidized the (pre-Web/NSF/NSCC) development !?