[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ih] Early email systems
- Subject: [ih] Early email systems
- From: dhc at dcrocker.net (Dave Crocker)
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:35:51 -0700
- In-reply-to: <ema70647c9-20e5-4798-9c95-608f23e78fef@laptop-93l8qkek>
- References: <[email protected]> <embf0b0613-6d9e-4b2f-b053-214eb84d187e@laptop-93l8qkek> <[email protected]> <ema70647c9-20e5-4798-9c95-608f23e78fef@laptop-93l8qkek>
On 7/17/2018 8:22 PM, ian.peter at ianpeter.com wrote:
> Perhaps I should explain further about the MAILER-Daemon notifications:
> I thought someone here might know.
>
> I know the term Daemon has been used since the 1960s to describe various
Unix was created in 1969.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daemon_(computing):
"The term was coined by the programmers of MIT's Project MAC."
> UNIX background processes: what I am looking for is an understanding
> about how they became invoked in email systems: were they perhaps part
> of POP of IMAP protocols? Or introduced in some other way when an email
> goes astray or to an unknown address?
Pop was much later. IMAP was much, /much/ later.
I think you are looking for asynchronous return error messages, and I
don't remember when those first started showing up. Messages were being
queued for asynchronous transfer -- and therefore asynchronous error
handling -- by the mid-/late-70s.
> Thanks for the information on sndmsg Dave - I thought that would be the
> case, and I think that is enough info for me on that. Somebody asked me
> these questions, I think maybe something to do with a patent application
> lawsuit, but as IANAT (I am not a techhead) I didn't feel I could answer
> adequately and I thought people here might be able to help.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net