[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?

Subject: [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
From: internet-history at gtaylor.tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:34:13 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 2/13/19 6:11 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Still what astonished me back then was that IPX/SPX wasn't successfully 
> extended - it ruled the lan then outside of the few campuses that had 
> tcp/ip. It fit into 64k.

Were there no ISPs that offered IPX connectivity?  Was it really only 
inside businesses / enterprises?

I guess I had assumed that there were.  ?\_(?)_/?

-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Follow-Ups:
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: dave at taht.net (Dave Taht)

References:
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: rwcallon at gmail.com (Ross Callon)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: jack at 3kitty.org (Jack Haverty)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: dave at taht.net (Dave Taht)

Prev by Date: [ih] Internet addressing history section
Next by Date: [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
Previous by thread: [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
Next by thread: [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread