[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ih] Internet History - Commercialization (was Re: When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?)

Subject: [ih] Internet History - Commercialization (was Re: When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?)
From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie)
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 17:44:53 -0500
In-reply-to: <CAHxHggfSxuPvkQW_Hae9gFYiW11+GVEmgn_CWkGDhdbGfzTAJw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAHQj4CckBoZQV2PT+tiSzvu2YqNjoyxMVOQqZfGBAOeAhXnXcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC20D2P5Af68tOPBHWC9OtXLqVQRTfWH10OM7NZw24vx2iviXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHQj4Cc7c3TEvMEUqi8QvFCAxkp5QPf32v_9DM+0PteBXwGK-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHxHggckzuU97wWJX=sdvwoRhYDbkLwHLbRPQ83dF72aZb6cmg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAHxHggfSxuPvkQW_Hae9gFYiW11+GVEmgn_CWkGDhdbGfzTAJw@mail.gmail.com>

Speaking as someone who was entirely outside the mainstream of Internet
development, and just looking to swap media with other folks, even trumpet
winsock etc was beyond our grasp.

The walls fell with the release of Netcom's Netcruiser in 94, essentially
ip/tcp, mosaic, archie, gopher, irc, telnet, ftp in a box.  That, combined
with a 386 system, and the world was your oyster.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
--------------------------------------------------------------
-
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://elists.isoc.org/pipermail/internet-history/attachments/20190216/1c2bff8f/attachment.html>

Follow-Ups:
- [ih] Internet History - Commercialization (was Re: When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?)
  - From: dot at dotat.at (Tony Finch)

References:
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: rwcallon at gmail.com (Ross Callon)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: jack at 3kitty.org (Jack Haverty)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: pnr at planet.nl (Paul Ruizendaal)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: jack at 3kitty.org (Jack Haverty)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: craig at tereschau.net (Craig Partridge)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: clemc at ccc.com (Clem Cole)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: craig at tereschau.net (Craig Partridge)
- [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
  - From: vint at google.com (Vint Cerf)
- [ih] Internet History - Commercialization (was Re: When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?)
  - From: jack at 3kitty.org (Jack Haverty)
- [ih] Internet History - Commercialization (was Re: When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?)
  - From: vint at google.com (Vint Cerf)

Prev by Date: [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
Next by Date: [ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
Previous by thread: [ih] Internet History - Commercialization (was Re: When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?)
Next by thread: [ih] Internet History - Commercialization (was Re: When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread