Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story

[justin at justinshore.com (Justin Shore)]

Is the whole AS (33302) rogue like the AS advertising the SF Bay Packet 
Radio block is?  Looking at the WHOIS for some of the prefixes 
advertised by both ASs, I see some common company names.  That would 
lead me to believe that 33302 is no better than 33211 but I can't 
confirm that.  Any takers?

Justin


Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Another legacy /16, after the previous one - the sf bay packet radio /16
> 
> http://www.47-usc-230c2.org/chapter3.html
> 
> This time 128.168/16 - and by the same group that seems to have acquired
> control of the earlier one.
> 
> --srs
>