Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story

[michael.dillon at bt.com (michael.dillon at bt.com)]

> > http://www.47-usc-230c2.org/chapter3.html
> > This time 128.168/16 - and by the same group that seems to have 
> > acquired control of the earlier one.
> 
> luckily, there is no black market in address space.  or at 
> least so the theory goes on arin and ripe public policy lists.

No, the theory goes that there *IS* a black market and changing ARIN
or RIPE policies to make it a white market would be a bad idea. Better 
to help ARIN to document the fact that this is not a valid allocation
so that they can recover the block.

--Michael Dillon