[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?

Subject: [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?
From: david at davidcoulson.net (David Coulson)
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 10:25:42 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <C441E5D8.14B333%[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Depends - It doesn't help if the DNS server is dead, but the front-end 
is still advertising the routes.

It came back to life for me a few moments ago (via Cogent) and it looks 
like the routing did not change (there is a bunch of 10/8 stuff in the 
traceroute).

Eric Spaeth wrote:
> If they were anycasted, shouldn't they be reachable from _somewhere_ 
> ?     Those servers are dead from the 4 corners of the US that I have 
> resources to use for testing.

Follow-Ups:
- [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?
  - From: tme at multicasttech.com (Marshall Eubanks)
- [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?
  - From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)
- [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?
  - From: mike at rockynet.com (Mike Lewinski)

References:
- [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?
  - From: branto at branto.com (Brant I. Stevens)
- [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?
  - From: eric at spaethco.com (Eric Spaeth)

Prev by Date: [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?
Next by Date: [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?
Previous by thread: [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?
Next by thread: [NANOG] Did Youtube not pay their domain bill?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread